🔗 Share this article

Recently, the game developers introduced a fresh playlist titled Casual Breakthrough. To put it simply, this option resembles the regular Breakthrough setup but includes a few key changes:

• Each team includes just eight real players, with the remaining made up of 32 bots.
• Actions done by real players grant full XP, while bot actions offer lower rewards.
• Just a pair of locations can be played: Siege of Cairo and Empire State.
• Elements like Dogtags, achievements, and career stat updates have been turned off.

In short, this mode lives up to its title: it offers a casual version of Breakthrough. At face value, one could assume it's a good idea, as it provides more options for gamers looking for alternative ways to have fun with the title. However, if video games has shown one thing, it is that not everyone will be happy. In other words, many BF6 players are upset.

Community Responses: Anger to Support

"Gamers prefer human opponents. Don't repeat the errors of your competitors," reads a response to the official announcement. "Truly disappointing idea," says another. At the same time, in community forums, a player notes, "I have no idea where we are going with this title," and someone else lists all the issues they consider to be problematic in the game: "Fix bugs, address drone issues, correct rocket mechanics, fix [the] bloom after sprinting bug, improve hit detection. We do not require this AI-heavy playlist."

However, for every complaint, some gamers explaining how much they're liking the new mode. "It's enjoyable to practice, real players prevent it from being a total farmfest but it's very relaxed," reads a forum post. "This subreddit doesn't understand that there are players who actually go outside and don't play this game all the time. Let them find a middle ground," states a different comment. A response via social media explains that as they're "a parent gamer with busy schedules, this is perfect for me," and someone else praises the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Valid Concerns and Player Input

Despite the support, players have valid points to criticize the new mode. Some users have highlighted that it will make wait times more extended for other modes because of the sheer number of playlists in the game already. Similarly, some areas already encounter AI-filled matches in the existing playlists. It also seems somewhat counterintuitive that the mode does not begin without a minimum number of real players, despite it primarily centers on combat against bots.

Lastly, one of the biggest grievances is that Battlefield Portal was meant to offer complete rewards, including AI matches, but that was removed when they attempted to remove bot farms from the system. So this new playlist feels like the player base compromising halfway, as per forum feedback. Another describes this addition as the developers "dropping the ball so hard, I experienced great enjoyment in the first couple of days, why did they feel the need to change it?"

Future Prospects: Adjustments Occur?

Should Battlefield Studios has proven anything so far with the latest installment, it's that they're paying attention and acting on player input. Tasks that were overly hard were adjusted rapidly, as did the required Redsec challenges. Chances are that, should analytics shows this new playlist is underperforming to their standards, they won't be shy to change it again.