Trump States Peace Proposal Is Not 'Final Offer' as Delegates Assemble for Swiss Meeting
Ex-leader Donald Trump stated on Saturday that the Russian-prepared proposal for peace constituted not his ultimate proposal, following intense criticism from Ukraine's leaders and commentators that likened it to the Munich pact of 1938 involving Neville Chamberlain and Hitler.
In short comments at the White House, the US president informed journalists: Our goal is to achieve peace. This should have occurred earlier … we’re trying to get it ended, in any case we have to get it ended."
Forthcoming Geneva Talks Involve Various Countries
Ukrainian and American officials will meet in Geneva this Sunday to discuss the plan. Security officials from Germany, France, and the UK will also participate in the talks there.
Ahead of these discussions, US senators told media outlets that State Department head Marco Rubio contacted them during his travel to Switzerland for clarification on the nature of the leaked plan. He said, this plan "was not the administration’s plan" but rather reflected Russian desires, as reported by Senator Angus King, a member on the Foreign Relations Committee.
Ukraine's President Confronts Crucial Deadline
However, the former president has given Volodymyr Zelenskyy until Thursday to sign this multi-point agreement. It calls on Kyiv to cede territory it currently controls to Russia, reduce the size of its army, and relinquish advanced weaponry. It also excludes international peacekeepers and penalties for Russian war crimes.
In a sombre address last Friday, the Ukrainian leader cautioned that his country confronts an impossible choice in the near future between preserving its national dignity and forfeiting key ally in the shape of the US. Zelenskyy acknowledged that it faces one of the most difficult moments historically.
Ukraine's Negotiating Delegation Appointed for Upcoming Talks
In comments on Saturday, the president said that genuine or "dignified" resolution depends on "guaranteed security and justice". He announced a negotiating team, established through a decree, that would soon meet its US counterparts in Switzerland, headed by his chief of staff Andriy Yermak.
A additional delegate from Ukraine's team, former defence minister and national security council secretary Rustem Umerov, said there would be discussions with the US regarding potential terms for a peace deal.
Suggesting red lines, Umerov noted: "Ukraine approaches this process with a clear understanding of its interests. This represents a continuation of recent discussions focused on harmonizing our plans for future actions."
Global Response and Criticism
The Ukrainian president has attempted to engage constructively with a White House apparently intent to end the conflict based on Russian conditions. He has emphasized that he will not surrender the nation's independence or disregard a constitution that enshrines Ukraine's territorial integrity.
During a summit held in South Africa, G20 leaders and the European Council released a collective declaration opposing Trump’s plan, stating it requires "additional work". The statement indicated that EU and Nato members would need to be consulted regarding certain clauses, that exclude Ukraine's NATO accession and impose terms on its future EU accession.
Public Views in Kyiv
Responses from Ukrainians to the text, prepared by Putin’s envoy and Trump’s representative, has been overwhelmingly hostile. Commentators said it was a blueprint for another Russian invasion: not only of Ukraine but other European regions as well.
Mustafa Nayyem, a journalist and politician involved in the 2014 Maidan protests, remarked it drew comparisons with Chamberlain’s infamous Munich deal. The proposal belonged to the same "recognisable genre", with the victim invited "to formulate his own defeat so everyone else can live easier".
On social media, Nayyem said his anger by the complete pardon for Russian atrocities. It was an insult those who sought shelter in affected cities – sites of civilian executions – and for those whose children had been forcibly deported to Russian territory. A deeply cynical deal, he stated.
Speaking in a Kyiv subway station, Dmytro Sariskyi, a young adult, said that Moscow has attempted to control Ukraine politically and territorially over many years. It conceded very little in the proposed deal and continued to keep its forces on Ukrainian soil. In my view, this deal aims to undermine Ukraine and impose unfair terms, he remarked.
If Zelenskyy signed off on the proposals Kyiv would be forced to sacrifice its liberties, he added. If rejected, the US would most likely break off cooperation and intelligence sharing, a crucial source of battlefield information for frontline Ukrainian troops. "There is no good way out of this for now," he noted.
Varied Perspectives from the Public
A different commuter, 19-year-old Barchan, asserted that Ukraine would "keep strong" without American support. "We will fight for as long as it takes. Our territory will remain our territory, including Crimea and the east. They are Ukrainian land." She said that the president is intelligent and forecasted he would not cede territory.
Speaking in the rain, near a historical monument, Olena Ivanovna said she was grateful to Trump for his peace-making efforts. She suggested that Ukraine ought to consider to give away Crimea and the eastern Donbas region for a limited time if it meant maintaining US support. The president should conduct a public vote on this matter, she said.
EU Officials Condemn the Proposal
Former European heads of state have roundly condemned the plan. Finland’s former prime minister Marin called it a catastrophe, affecting not just Ukraine but for democracies worldwide. She warned if the west showed weakness and ignorance – similar to the 2014 Crimea annexation – "more aggression and conflicts" would follow.
Belgium's ex-PM, Verhofstadt, quoted Churchill’s definition regarding appeasement as someone who accommodates an aggressor. He continued: "Trump now takes Putin’s side. Europe must choose again: appeasement or our values, imperialism or freedom. A critical juncture for the European Union."